The framework, developed after years of negotiations and approved in draft form in April, would for the first time establish a mandatory global fuel standard and greenhouse gas pricing mechanism for ships.
Together, they aim to bring the global maritime fleet – which carries around 80% of global trade and produces almost 3% of global emissions – towards net zero emissions by 2050.
Not perfect but balanced base
Arsenio Dominguez, secretary general of International Maritime Organization (IMO), highlighted the “particular importance” of the week-long session to the agency and its work.
He recognized that Some countries view the plan as too ambitious, while others say it does not go far enough..
“IMO the Net-Zero framework is not perfect,“, he told delegates, “However, it constitutes a balanced basis for the continuation of our work with a view to its entry into force in 2027.»
“This process has been inclusive and thorough,” Mr. Dominguez added, urging delegates to approach the negotiations “with diplomacy and respect.”
“Here we are diplomatic and respectful of each other, we listen to everyone’s opinion, we move forward and we always seek to improve in this ever-changing industry.”
The IMO currently has 176 member states and three associate members.
The frame
The IMO session Marine Environment Protection Committee will continue until Friday, when delegates are expected to vote on adopting the framework as an amendment to the main international treaty to reduce air pollution from shipping and improving energy efficiency.
If adopted, the rules would apply to all ocean-going ships over 5,000 gross tonnes, which together account for about 85 percent of shipping-related emissions. National governments will be responsible for enforcement.
Ships would be required to gradually reduce their reliance on carbon-emitting fuels and pay the price for excess emissions, with revenue to be reinvested in clean energy transition measures and support for developing countries.
If a ship emits below a certain threshold, it can store or trade its excess units and, similarly, if a ship switches entirely to zero or near-zero emissions fuels, it is entitled to financial rewards.
Strong headwinds
The proposal, however, faces strong objections from the United States.
In a joint statement last week, the US secretaries of Energy and Transportation said the framework amounted to “a global carbon tax”, warning that it could increase transportation costs by more than 10% and harm US consumers.
The statement warned that Washington would consider imposing visa restrictions, trade sanctions and new port fees on countries supporting the framework.
Publicado anteriormente en Almouwatin.
